Schlosser comes closest to confronting this question in his brief essay on the migrant workforce in the Californian strawberry fields. In conclusion he merely states that a black market is the unhealthy manifestation of the gap between public and private morality.
Yet without an international perspective it is hard to know what circumstances lead to black markets. The inescapable reason why Mexicans are prepared to suffer life in California is because, however bad the working conditions, they are better than those at home.
Notwithstanding its age, the strongest section of the book is the one dealing with marijuana. In a book that features a diverting fact or figure on almost every page Schlosser is nothing if not a diligent sifter of statisticsthe title essay harvests a rich crop of legal absurdities regarding the trade in marijuana.
In this sense the black economy is a global question that requires multinational solutions. This may be a laudable stance but it tells us little that we did not know or could not guess. Schlosser seems to suggest that an absence of government regulation is one probable cause.
He makes the obvious point that the underground and legitimate markets are related - are usually separated, in fact, by little more than temporary moral fashions - but he stops short of defining that relationship.
In passing he notes estimates that put the black economy in Britain at In the event, however, he prefers to concentrate his attention on the raw deal that such migrants often receive north of the border. Does the success of a black economy inevitably lead to its legitimisation or the failure of a legitimate economy necessitate its movement underground?
Perhaps that is why so many have become bestsellers. Today, of course, pornography has become a mainstream business whose profits go to tax-paying companies. Another is that the book feels out of date.
Indeed such is the stated importance of these books that buying them rather than reading them appears less an act of intellectual curiosity than one of social responsibility.
It was a clear, detailed argument in no way impaired by its lack of originality. The first book was a classic of the form because its subject - the hegemony of the hamburger - was both the symbol and the cause of all contemporary American and therefore planetary ills.
But what would it do for the poorest Mexicans?
What he does not mention is that in Britain the black economy is blamed on too little state regulation and in Italy on too much. It would have made for a more interesting thesis if Schlosser had examined whether these parallel markets need one another.
At any rate, surely it is time someone wrote a book about the global fall-out of this particular cultural trend. In the case of the essay on Sturman, for instance, we get a riveting yarn about how a secretive businessman avoided paying taxes. The title piece, for example, is an only slightly updated version of an article that first appeared in Atlantic Monthly almost a decade ago.
One problem is that Schlosser examines three disparate markets marijuana, illegal migrant labour and pornography which have little in common. That his taxes were due on what was then a mostly illicit operation seems only incidental.
But this is a book whose concern is only really with America.
There are many more. Schlosser does not say. Does that mean they too should be legalised, or at least decriminalised? Chief among these is the case of one Mark Young who was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for introducing a marijuana grower to a dealer. Whether or not this is an improvement Schlosser manages to avoid saying.
But as to what should fill that gap, he leaves us, like his subject, in the dark. He acknowledges that the high-risk of strawberry cultivation encourages many growers to cut their costs by employing Mexican workers.
It is madness and there is ample proof here that the war on drugs does not work. If American drug policy is not working with marijuana neither is it working with hard drugs such as cocaine and heroin. The approach to each subject also seems unrelated, as if their shared theme emerged only after they were written.
A suitable choice for author might be Eric Schlosser, who knows the genre well, having written Fast Food Nation and, now, Reefer Madness.
Here the author is in command of his argument:Free reefer madness papers, essays, and research papers.
My Account. Your search returned over essays for " Brief comment on the subject matter leading to thesis statement There lies a link between creativity and madness and the association stems from the need of an unconventional thought process to spark creativity and biological.
In Reefer Madness, the author, Eric Schlosser argues on the level of success attained in a fast food nation using low quality articles. Schlosser discussing matters relating to drugs, sex and the supply of cheap labor that the American population access.
one can see that the end result was madness. Thesis statement: Through feigning. Jan 13, · A good weed statement to start off my paper. Discussion in 'Apprentice Tokers' started by JetsDropBombs, Jan 13, It’s overall taboo nature today is a result of early propaganda, such as reefer madness, forming the opinions of post Industrial Revolution Americans.
Thesis: Though the use, sale, and cultivation of cannabis in. The s government propaganda film Reefer Madness, which I saw for the first time in class, portrays marijuana in a way that I haven’t seen.
It gives the impression that marijuana is the worst drug known to man and will literally destroy your life. In the movie, it associates use of weed with reckless driving, manslaughter, murder, rape. Thesis Statement: My persuasive speech is on the topic of Marijuana Legalization.
When some people hear this their mind immediately refers backs to.
Reefer Madness and Other Tales from the American Underworld It would have made for a more interesting thesis if Schlosser had examined whether these parallel markets need one another. Does.Download